Dialog server for handling conversation in virtual space method and computer program for having conversation in virtual space

ABSTRACT

A dialog server which provides dialogs made by at least one user through their respective avatars in a virtual space. A method and a computer readable article of manufacture tangibly embodying computer readable instructions for executing the steps of the method are also provided. The dialog server includes: a position storage unit which stores positional information on the avatars; an utterance receiver which receives at least one utterance of avatars and utterance strength representing an importance or attention level of the utterance; an interest level calculator which calculates interest levels between avatars based on their positional information; a message processor which generates a message based on the utterance in accordance with a value calculated from the interest levels and the utterance strength; and a message transmitter which transmits the message to the avatars.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/406,954, filed Feb. 28, 2012 (status: pending), which is acontinuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/389,073, filed Feb.19, 2009 (which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,156,184 on Apr. 10, 2012),which claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to Japanese PatentApplication No. 2008-38422, filed Feb. 20, 2008, the contents of each ofwhich are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference in theirentireties for all purposes.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a dialog server providing dialogsbetween users and more particularly, it relates to a method and acomputer program for having a conversation in a virtual space.

2. Description of Related Art

Previously, services allowing multiple users to exchange messages andthereby to have a conversation have been provided. Such services includea video conference service utilizing text chat, images and audio.Recently, it is being realized that a large number of users have aconversation in a virtual space. Since each user has been able toexchange messages with a large number of other users, it is necessary toconnect each of these other users with his/her messages so that eachuser can distinguish messages of one user from those of another.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2004-267433 (hereinafterreferred to as Patent Document 1) and Japanese Patent ApplicationPublication No. 2007-072511 (hereinafter referred to as Patent Document2) each discloses a method of processing an inputted speech sound tooutput a message. According to the method described in Patent Document1, an inputted speech sound is converted or combined with another soundso as to be closely associated with a virtual space before beingoutputted as a chat sound. According to the method described in PatentDocument 2, a speech sound of a character assigned to a client terminalis synthesized and by using this character's speech sound, speech-sounddata corresponding to a message inputted from the client terminal isgenerated.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. Hei 9-006985 (hereinafterreferred to as Patent Document 3) and Japanese Patent ApplicationPublication No. Hei 10-079929 (hereinafter referred to as PatentDocument 4) disclose a method of bringing a user other than a certainuser into a view of the certain user. According to the method describedin Patent Document 3, a distance between a first avatar a and a secondavatar b is measured. If the distance is not more than a threshold valueL and the first avatar a looks at the second avatar b, and if thedistance is kept not more than a threshold value L for a time period notless than a threshold value T, the second avatar b is rotated in thecurrent position or moved until the first and second avatars a and blook at each other. According to the method described in Patent Document4, a graphically displayed icon representing a user who participates ina shared 3D space is brought into a view of another user in response tostrength and feature quantity of the former user's speech sound.

Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2001-228794 (hereinafterreferred to as Patent Document 5) discloses a method of displaying, in aview of a user, a message of another user at a position varying inaccordance with a position of the latter user, if the message is a textmessage. According to the method described in Patent Document 5, aposition in which text-based information to be displayed of aspeaker-user is determined on the basis of a distance between thespeaker-user and a listener-user, a view of the listener-user, a 3Dposition of the speaker-user, and a vector indicating speaker-user'sline of sight. Thereafter, the text-based information is outputted inthe thus-determined position.

If the above conventional techniques are applied to a situation eachuser exchanges messages with a large number of other users, thefollowing problems will arise. If the large number of other userssimultaneously output messages, the methods of Patent Documents 1 and 2allow the messages to have different tones and sounds. However, it isstill difficult to recognize a certain message from these overlappingsounds. If there are a large number of users in a certain area, themethods of Patent Documents 3 and 4 keep the views of the certain userand the large number of other users frequently moving, so that the usershave difficulties in continuing conversations. If a large number ofmessages are simultaneously displayed, the method of Patent Document 5allows each message to be displayed in a position corresponding to apositional relationship between a listener-user and a speaker-user.However, it is still difficult to distinguish messages of one user fromthose of another.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention provides a dialog server, a method, and a computerprogram thereof, of providing smooth communication between a largenumber of users in a virtual space.

According to a first aspect of the present invention, a dialog serverfor providing dialogs made by at least one user through at least oneavatar in virtual space is provided. The dialog server includes: aposition storage unit for storing at least one positional information onat least one avatar; an utterance receiver for receiving (i) at leastone utterance of at least one avatar, and (ii) at least one utterancestrength representing an importance or attention level of at least oneutterance; an interest level calculator for calculating at least oneinterest level between two of at least one avatar to each other, basedon at least one positional information of at least one avatar; a messageprocessor for generating a message from at least one utterance inaccordance with a value calculated from at least one interest level andat least one utterance strength; and a message transmitter fortransmitting at least one message to at least one avatar.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a method ofproviding dialogs made by at least one user through at least one avatarin a virtual space is provided. The method includes the steps of:storing at least one positional information based on at least oneavatar; receiving (i) at least one utterance from at least one avatarand (ii) at least one utterance strength representing an importance orattention level of at least one utterance; calculating at least oneinterest level between two avatars based on their positionalinformation; generating at least one message from at least one utterancein accordance with a value calculated from the interest level and theutterance strength; and transmitting at least one message to otheravatars.

According to another aspect of the present invention, a computerreadable article of manufacture tangibly embodying computer readableinstructions for executing the steps of the above method.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of the embodiments of the presentinvention and the advantages thereof, reference is now made to thefollowing descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanyingdrawings.

FIG. 1 is a functional block diagram showing a configuration of a dialogserver according to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing flow of the dialog serveraccording to an embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing a positional relationship betweenavatars of a speaker and a listener used for calculating an interestlevel in an embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 4-1 to 4-5 illustrate Example 1 of the present invention.

FIGS. 5-1 to 5-5 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 4-1 to 4-5.

FIGS. 6-1 to 6-5 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 5-1 to 5-5.

FIGS. 7-1 to 7-5 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 6-1 to 6-5.

FIGS. 8-1 to 8-3 are perspective views, each showing the positionalrelationship (between the avatars of a speaker and a listener) used forcalculating a value from interest levels and the voice volume of anutterance in the embodiment of the present invention.

FIGS. 9-1 to 9-4 illustrate Example 2 of the present invention.

FIGS. 10-1 to 10-4 illustrate Example 2 of the present invention.

FIGS. 11-1 to 11-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 10-1 to10-4.

FIGS. 12-1 to 12-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 11-1 to11-4.

FIGS. 13-1 to 13-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 12-1 to12-4.

FIGS. 14-1 to 14-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 13-1 to13-4.

FIGS. 15-1 to 15-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 14-1 to14-4.

FIGS. 16-1 to 16-4 illustrate a situation subsequent to FIGS. 15-1 to15-4.

FIG. 17 shows an information processor as a typical example of ahardware configuration of the dialog server, a speaker-user terminal anda listener-user terminal.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

A description of preferred embodiments of the present invention followswith reference to the drawings.

The term “virtual space” in the context of the present invention means acollection of data in which background scenery and objects each having aposition and a direction are arranged. The term “avatar” means an objectassociated with a user as a character representing the user in a virtualspace.

“Utterance strength” is a value indicating deliverability of anutterance, and represents, for example, a voice volume of the utterance.It is also an importance level of the utterance for an avatar making theutterance, and further, it is an attention level of the utterance for anavatar receiving the utterance. The utterance strength is attached to anutterance by an avatar making the utterance.

“Interest level” is defined herein as being a value indicating utterancedeliverability between two avatars, and automatically calculated inaccordance with a positional relationship including each direction fromone avatar to the other and a distance between the avatars.

If a certain avatar makes an utterance, the dialog server can transmit acontent of the utterance to each of other avatars as a message inaccordance with a value calculated from the utterance strength and theinterest levels of the certain avatar to the each of other avatars andof the each of other avatars to the certain avatar. As a result, anutterance of an avatar is delivered to another avatar in accordance witha value which is calculated from interest levels automaticallycalculated from positions of the avatars and utterance strength of theutterance. Thus, the dialog server can provide a smooth communicationusing a conversation in a virtual space where a large number of usersparticipate.

If a certain avatar makes an utterance, the dialog server can transmitthe utterance to each of other avatars when a value calculated from theutterance strength and the interest levels of the certain avatar to theeach of other avatars and of the each of other avatars to the certainavatar is not less than a predetermined value. As a result, an utteranceof an avatar is delivered to another avatar when a value which iscalculated from interest levels automatically calculated from positionsof the avatars and utterance strength of the utterance is not less thana predetermined value. Thus, the dialog server can provide a smoothcommunication using a conversation in a virtual space where a largenumber of users participate.

Referring to FIG. 1, a functional block diagram showing a configurationof a dialog server as an example of an embodiment of the presentinvention is provided. A dialog server 10 receives utterance data andutterance strength data transmitted by a speaker-user terminal 21 via anutterance receiver 11. The utterance data can be either text data orsound data. The utterance strength data indicates deliverability of anutterance of a speaker to a listener. For example, the utterancestrength data can indicate a value designated by a speaker, as dataseparate from the utterance data, or can indicate voice volume of theutterance of sound data.

Dialog server 10 also receives positional information data transmittedby the speaker-user terminal 21 or the listener-user terminal 22,through a position receiver 12. The positional information dataindicates the positions of avatars respectively representing one or morespeakers and one or more listeners in a virtual space. For example, thepositional information data includes an avatars' coordinate informationin the virtual space and an avatars' facing directions.

A position storage unit 13 stores the received positional information onthe avatars of the speakers and listeners. If the position storage unit13 has already stored any positional information, it updates the storedpositional information, and stores the updated positional information.The interest level calculator 15 reads the positional information storedin the position storage unit 13, and calculates the interest levels ofthe speakers to the listeners and interest levels of the listeners tothe speakers from the positional relationships between the avatars ofthe speakers and listeners.

An utterance strength calculator 14 calculates the utterance strengthfrom either the utterance data or the utterance strength data receivedfrom the utterance receiver 11. For example, in the case where theutterance strength data indicates a value designated and inputted by aspeaker, as data separate from the utterance data, the value can benormalized to be made into the utterance strength. In the case where theutterance strength data indicates voice volume of the utterance of sounddata, the voice volume can be normalized to be made into the utterancestrength.

Message processor 16 processes the utterance in accordance with theinterest levels calculated by the interest level calculator 15 and theutterance strength calculated by the utterance strength calculator 14,and thereby generates a message. For example, in generating the message,the message processor 16 can change the font size or the sound volume ofthe utterance in accordance with the interest levels and the utterancestrength. Alternatively, message processor 16 can generate a messagefrom the utterance only when a value calculated from the interest levelsand the content of the utterance exceeds a certain threshold value.

Message transmitter 17 transmits the generated message to thelistener-user terminal 22. The position transmitter 18 reads thepositional information on the avatars of both the speakers and listenersstored in the position storage unit 13, and transmits the information tothe speaker-user terminal 21 and the listener-user terminal 22, aspositional information data.

FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing flow of the dialog server 10according to an embodiment of the present invention. The dialog server10 receives positional information data on avatars of one or morespeakers and one or more listeners in a virtual space (step S11), aswell as utterance data and utterance strength data of each speaker (stepS12).

In step S13, the dialog server 10 updates positional information on theavatars of speakers and listeners based on the positional informationdata received in step S11. Thereafter, the dialog server 10 reads theupdated positional information on the avatars of the speakers andlisteners (step S14), and calculates the interest levels based on theupdated positional information on the avatars of the speakers andlisteners (step S15).

In step S16, dialog server 10 calculates a value from both the interestlevels of the avatars of the speakers and listeners and the utterancestrength calculated from the utterance strength data received in stepS12. Thereafter, dialog server 10 determines whether or not thecalculated value is not less than a predetermined value (step S17). Ifthe calculated value is not less than the predetermined value, theprocessing proceeds to step S18. If the calculated value is less thanthe predetermined value, the processing proceeds to step S20.

In step S18, dialog server 10 generates a message from the content ofthe utterance received in step S12. Thereafter, the dialog server 10transmits the generated message (step S19). In step S20, the dialogserver 10 transmits, as positional information data, positionalinformation on the avatars which is updated in step S13.

FIG. 3 is a perspective view showing a positional relationship betweenavatars of a speaker and a listener used for calculating an interestlevel in an embodiment of the present invention. An interest level I_(J)of an avatar A_(i to an avatar A) _(j) in a virtual space is defined asshown in the following expression (1):

$\begin{matrix}{I_{i,j} = {d\; \frac{\cos \; \theta}{L}}} & \lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 1} \rbrack\end{matrix}$

where θ is an angle made by a facing direction of the avatar A_(i) and astraight line connecting positions of the respective avatars A_(i) andA_(j), and L is a distance between the avatars A_(i) and A_(j). Here, dis a term for normalizing an interest level of a speaker or a listenerto satisfy the following expression (2):

$\begin{matrix}{{\sum\limits_{j = l}^{n}I_{i,j}} = 1} & \lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 2} \rbrack\end{matrix}$

where n is the number of avatars who exist in a circular region whosecenter is the position of the avatar A_(i) and whose radius r_(i) is apredetermined distance.

FIGS. 4-1 to 7-5 illustrate Example 1 of the present invention. FIG. 4-1is a perspective view showing three avatars A, B and Ch sitting around acircular table in a virtual space. A, B and Ch sit in the positionslocated at the same distance from the center of the table while facingthe center of the table. More specifically, straight lines connectingthe center of the table and the respective positions of A, B and Ch are120.degree. of each other.

FIG. 4-2 shows A's view. A faces the midpoint between B and Ch. FIG. 4-3shows B's view. B faces the midpoint between A and Ch. FIG. 4-4 showsCh's view. Ch faces the midpoint between A and B.

FIG. 4-5 is a table summarizing interest levels between A, B and Ch. A,B and Ch sit at respective vertices of an equilateral triangle, so thatthe distances between A, B and Ch are the same. Since each of theavatars A, B and Ch face the midpoint of the opposite side of thisequilateral triangle, the facing direction of each avatar and thedirections from the avatar to the other respective avatars are at thesame angle, in this case, 30.degree. From above expressions (1) and (2),the interest levels between A, B and Ch are set to the same value. It isassumed that an utterance of one avatar is delivered to another as amessage, if an interest level from the latter avatar to the formeravatar is not less than 0.5. Accordingly, in the situation shown in FIG.4-5, an utterance of any of the avatars is delivered to the otheravatars as messages.

FIG. 5-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.4-1. Ch speaks while A and B look at Ch. FIG. 5-2 shows A's view. Alooks at Ch. FIG. 5-3 shows B's view. B looks at Ch. FIG. 5-4 shows Ch'sview. Ch faces the midpoint between A and B.

FIG. 5-5 is a table summarizing interest levels between A, B and Ch. Aand B look at Ch. Accordingly, the interest levels of A to Ch and B toCh has increased, while the interest levels of A to B and B to A hasdecreased. The facing direction of Ch remains unchanged from thesituation shown in FIG. 4, so that the interest levels of Ch to A and Chto B also remain unchanged from that situation.

In the situation shown in FIG. 5-5, A's utterances are delivered to Chas messages, but not to B. Similarly, B's utterances are delivered to Chas messages, but are not to A. On the other hand, Ch's utterances aredelivered to both A and B as messages. These conditions allow only Ch'sutterances to be delivered to A and B as messages. Accordingly, A and Bcan hear only the Ch's utterances as messages.

FIG. 6-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.5-1. B speaks to Ch, and Ch faces a point closer to B than the midpointbetween A and B. A and B look at Ch. FIG. 6-2 shows A's view. A looks atCh. FIG. 6-3 shows B's view. B looks at Ch. FIG. 6-4 shows Ch's view. Chfaces the point closer to B than the midpoint between A and B.

FIG. 6-5 is a table summarizing interest levels between A, B and Ch. Aand B look at Ch as similar to the situation shown in FIG. 5.Accordingly, the interest levels of A to Ch, B to Ch, A to B and B to Aremain unchanged from the situation shown in FIG. 5. Ch faces the pointcloser to B than the midpoint between A and B, so that the interestlevel of Ch to B has increased over the situation shown in FIG. 5, whilethe interest level of Ch to A has decreased as compared to the situationshown in FIG. 5.

In the situation shown in FIG. 6-5, A's utterances are not delivered toCh or B. B's utterances are delivered to Ch as messages, but not to A.Similarly, Ch's utterances are delivered to B as messages, but not to A.These conditions allow Ch and B to have a conversation without beinginterrupted by any A's utterance, while preventing A from beingdisturbed by any of B's personal questions.

FIG. 7-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.6-1. Ch speaks to A, while facing a point closer to A than the midpointbetween A and B. A and B look at Ch. FIG. 7-2 shows A's view. A looks atCh. FIG. 7-3 shows B's view. B looks at Ch. FIG. 7-4 shows Ch's view. Chfaces the point closer to A than the midpoint between A and B.

FIG. 7-5 is a table summarizing interest levels between A, B and Ch. Aand B look at Ch similar to the situation shown in FIG. 6. Accordingly,the interest levels of A to Ch, B to Ch, A to B and B to A remainunchanged from the situation shown in FIG. 6. Ch faces the point closerto A than the midpoint between A and B, so that the interest level of Chto A has increased over the situation shown in FIG. 6, while theinterest level of Ch to B has decreased as compared to the situationshown in FIG. 6.

In the situation shown in FIG. 7-5, A's utterances are delivered to Chas messages, but not to B. B's utterances are not delivered to Ch or A.In addition, Ch's utterances are delivered to A as messages, but not toB. In FIG. 7-2, dialog between Ch and B is exchanged. This dialog issequentially reproduced to be delivered to A as messages. This allows Ato trace the content of the conversation between Ch and B, andaccordingly allows Ch to deliver B's valuable remarks to A whilepreventing B from hearing what has already been said to B. Thissequential reproduction can be deactivated by either A or Ch.

In the above Example 1, an interest level of each avatar calculated fromthe positional information of avatars is a value that becomes larger as(1) the direction from one avatar becomes closer to the direction ofanother avatar or (2) as the avatar stands closer to another avatar.Afterwards, it is determined whether or not to deliver an utterance ofthe avatar to the certain avatar as a message based on the calculatedinterest level. Accordingly, whether or not to deliver an utterance as amessage can be automatically chosen in accordance with positions of theavatars.

As mentioned in Example 1, when the avatar acquires only a low interestlevel, certain dialogs are not delivered to an avatar as messages. Evenin this case, if the message delivery is resumed in response to the factthat the avatar acquires a high interest level, the undelivered messagescan be sequentially delivered to the avatar. In that event, the user ofthe avatar can choose whether or not to hear the undelivered messages.

FIGS. 8-1 to 8-3 are perspective views each showing a positionalrelationship between avatars of a speaker and a listener used fordetermining whether or not to deliver an utterance as a message inanother embodiment of the present invention. Specifically, suchdetermination is made based on a scale value calculated from interestlevels and a voice volume of the utterance. FIG. 8-1 is a perspectiveview showing a positional relationship between avatars A_(i) and A_(i)in a virtual space. A condition under which an As utterance is deliveredto A₁ as a message is defined on the basis of a preset threshold levelTH as shown in the following expression (3):

$\begin{matrix}{{I_{i,j} = {d_{i}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{i}}{L}}}{I_{j,i} = {d_{j}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{j}}{L}}}{{{I_{i,j} \times p_{i}} + I_{j,i}} > {TH}}} & \lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 3} \rbrack\end{matrix}$

where θ_(i) is an angle made by the facing direction of A_(i) and astraight line connecting positions of A_(i) and A_(j). θ_(j) is an anglemade by a facing direction of A_(j) and a straight line connectingpositions of A_(i) and A_(j). L is a distance between the avatars A_(i)and A_(j), and p_(i) is a voice volume of the A_(i)'s utterance. Here,d_(i) and d_(j) are terms used for the normalization mentionedpreviously.

FIG. 8-2 is a perspective view showing a situation where the avatar A₁speaks to the avatar A₂ at a voice volume level p₁. In this case, thefollowing result is obtained instead of the expression (3):

$\begin{matrix}{{l_{1,2} = {d_{1}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{1}}{L}}}{l_{2,1} = {d_{2}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{2}}{L}}}{{{l_{1,2} \times p_{i}} + l_{2,1}} \leqq {TH}}} & \lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 4} \rbrack\end{matrix}$

This means that this situation does not satisfy the condition defined inthe expression (3), and thus A₁'s utterances are not delivered to A₂ asmessages. Accordingly, the displayed image of A₂ is darkened to indicatethat A₁'s messages are not delivered to A₂.

$l_{i,j} = {d_{i}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{i}}{L}}$$l_{j,i} = {d_{j}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{j}}{L}}$l_(i, j) × p_(i) + l_(j, i) > TH

FIG. 8-3 is a perspective view showing a situation where the avatar A₁speaks to the avatar A₂ at a voice volume level p₂. In this case, thefollowing result is obtained instead of the expression (3):

$\begin{matrix}{{l_{1,2} = {d_{1}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{1}}{L}}}{l_{2,1} = {d_{2}\frac{\cos \; \theta_{2}}{L}}}{{{l_{1,2} \times p_{2}} + l_{2,1}} > {TH}}} & \lbrack {{Expression}\mspace{14mu} 5} \rbrack\end{matrix}$

This means that this situation satisfies the condition defined inExpression 3, and thus A₁'s utterances are delivered to A₂ as messages.Accordingly, the displayed image of A₂ returns to normal indicating thatA₁'s messages are delivered to A₂.

FIGS. 9-1 to 16-4 illustrate Example 2, which is another embodiment ofthe present invention. FIG. 9-1 is a perspective view showing sevenavatars A to F and Ch sitting around a rectangular table in a virtualspace. Among A to F, three avatars sit at one longer side of the tableand the remaining three avatars sit at the other longer side of thetable. More specifically, the avatars at each side sit at regularintervals while facing the avatars at the other side. Ch sits at ashorter side of the table while facing in a direction perpendicular tothe facing directions of A to F.

FIG. 9-2 shows Ch's view. A to F sit at the longer sides of the tableswhile A, and E face B, D and F, respectively. Ch sits at the midpoint ofthe shorter side which is closer to A and B facing each other whilefacing the midpoint of the opposite side. FIG. 9-3 shows C's view. D whofaces C is seen in front of C, B who faces A is seen at a positioncloser to Ch, and F who faces E is seen at a position more distant fromCh. FIG. 9-4 shows F's view. E who faces F is seen in front of F, and Cwho faces D is seen at a position closer to Ch.

FIG. 10-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.9-1. A to F and Ch face the same direction as in the situation shown inFIG. 9-1, and speak with a normal voice volume. FIG. 10-2 shows Ch'sview. Since A and B sit closer to Ch, their utterances with a normalvoice volume satisfy the condition defined in the expression (3), andthus are delivered to Ch as messages. On the other hand, since C to Fsit farther from Ch, their utterances with a normal voice volume do notsatisfy the condition defined in the expression (3), and thus are notdelivered to Ch as messages. Similarly, since C to F sit farther fromCh, Ch's utterances with a normal voice volume do not satisfy thecondition defined in the expression (3), and thus are not delivered toCh as messages. Accordingly, the display images of C to F are darkenedin the Ch's view as shown in FIG. 10-2.

FIG. 10-3 shows C's view. Utterances with a normal voice volume of B, Dand F are delivered to C as messages. Since each of B, D and F isregarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from C which allowC's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to the each ofB, D and F as messages, the display images of B, D and F are normal inC's view. FIG. 10-4 shows F's view. Utterances of E and C are deliveredto F as messages. Since both E and C are regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from F which allow F's utterances with anormal voice volume to be delivered to the each of E and C as messages,the display images of E and C are normal in the F's view.

FIG. 11-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.10-1. Ch faces the same direction as in the situation shown in FIG.10-1, and speaks with a voice louder than normal. FIG. 11-2 shows Ch'sview. Ch speaks with the louder voice, and thus Ch's message is evendelivered to C to F. Accordingly, the display images of C to F which aredarkened in the situation shown in FIG. 10 now become normal in Ch'sview.

FIG. 11-3 shows C's view. Ch speaks with the louder voice, and thus Ch'smessage is delivered to C even though Ch is out of the C's view. FIG.11-4 shows F′s view. Ch speaks with the louder voice, and thus Ch'smessage is delivered to F even though Ch is out of the F's view.

FIG. 12-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.11-1. Since Ch's utterance with the louder voice in the situation shownin FIG. 11-1 is delivered to A to F as a message, all the avatars lookat Ch now. Ch faces the same direction as in the situation shown in FIG.11-1, and speaks with a normal voice volume.

FIG. 12-2 shows Ch's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume. A to Fare looking directly at Ch. Accordingly, even though C to F are regardedas sitting at a distance and in a direction from Ch which normally cannot allow Ch's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered toC to F as messages, C to F are regarded as sitting at a distance and ina direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with a normal voicevolume to be delivered to C to F as messages. Therefore the displayimages of C to F are normal in FIG. 10-2.

FIG. 12-3 shows C's view. C looks at Ch. Accordingly, C is regarded tosit at a distance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to C as messages, and thusthe display image of Ch is normal in the C's view. Ch's utterances witha normal voice volume are delivered to C as messages. A looks at Ch andthe direction from C to A is some degrees away from the facing directionof C. Accordingly, A is regarded to sit at a distance and in a directionfrom C which allow none of C's utterances with a normal voice volume tobe delivered to A as messages. Thus, the display image of A is darkenedin the C's view as shown in FIG. 12-3.

FIG. 12-4 shows F's view. F looks at Ch. Accordingly, F is regarded tosit at a distance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to F as messages, and thusthe display image of Ch is normal in the F's view. Ch's utterances witha normal voice volume are delivered to F as messages. A and B look at Chand the directions from F to A and to B are some degrees away from thefacing direction of F. Accordingly, A and B are regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from F which allow none of F's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to A or B as messages. Thus,the display images of A and B are darkened in the F's view as shown inFIG. 12-4.

FIG. 13-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to FIG.12-1. Ch faces the same direction as in the situation shown in FIG.12-1, and speaks with a normal voice volume. A to E look at Ch while Flooks at C. F speaks to C with a normal voice volume.

FIG. 13-2 shows Ch's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume, and Ato E look at Ch. Accordingly, A to E are regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with anormal voice volume to be delivered to A to E as messages, and thus thedisplay images of A to E are normal in the Ch's view. F looks at C.Accordingly, F is regarded as sitting at a distance and in a directionfrom Ch which allow none of Ch's utterances with a normal voice volumeto be delivered to F as messages, and thus the display image of F isdarkened in the Ch's view.

FIG. 13-3 shows C's view. C looks at Ch. Accordingly, C is regarded tosit at a distance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to C as messages, and thusCh's utterances with a normal voice volume are delivered to C asmessages. F looks at C. Accordingly, C is regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from F which allow F's utterances with anormal voice volume to be delivered to C as messages, and thus F'sutterance with a normal voice volume is delivered to C as a message.

A looks at Ch and the direction from C to A is some degrees away fromthe facing direction of C. Accordingly, A is regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from C which allow none of C's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to A as messages. Thus, thedisplay image of A is darkened in the C's view.

FIG. 13-4 shows F's view. Since F looks at C, F is regarded as sittingat a distance and in a direction from C which allow C's utterances witha normal voice volume, if they were, to be delivered to F as messages.Thus, the display image of C is normal in the F's view. A and E look atCh and the directions from F to A and to E are some degrees away fromthe facing direction of F. Accordingly, A and E are regarded as sittingat a distance and in a direction from F which allow none of F'sutterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to A or E asmessages. Thus, the display images of A and E are darkened in the F'sview. These conditions allow F's utterances referring to earlierdiscussion to be delivered only to C selected by F as one to whom theseutterances should be delivered as messages, while preventing A, B, D, Eand Ch from hearing the utterances. This allows F to express opinionswithout interrupting the discussion on the table.

FIG. 14-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to thatof FIG. 13-1. Ch faces the same direction as in the situation shown inFIG. 13-1, and speaks with a normal voice volume. A, B, D and E look atCh, while F looks at C and speaks to C with a normal voice volume. SinceF's utterance in the situation shown in FIG. 13 is delivered to C as amessage, C looks at F now.

FIG. 14-2 shows Ch's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume while A,B, D and E look at Ch. Accordingly, A, B, D and E are regarded assitting at a distance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch'sutterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to A, B, D and Eas messages, and thus the display images of A, B, D and E are normal inthe Ch's view. F and C look at each other. Accordingly, C and F areregarded to sit at a distance and in a direction from Ch which allownone of Ch's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered tothe C or F as messages, and thus the display images of C and F aredarkened in the Ch's view.

FIG. 14-3 shows C's view. Since C and F look at each other, F isregarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from C which allowC's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to F asmessages. Accordingly, the display image of F is normal in the C's view.F's utterances with a normal voice volume are delivered to C asmessages. On the other hand, D looks at Ch and the direction from C to Dis some degrees away from the facing direction of C. Accordingly, D isregarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from C which allownone of C's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to Das messages. Thus, the display image of D is darkened in the C's view.

FIG. 14-4 shows F's view. Since C and F look at each other, C isregarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from F which allowF's utterances with a normal voice volume, if they were, to be deliveredto C as messages. Thus, the display image of C is normal in the F'sview. A and E look at Ch and the directions from F to A and F to E aresome degrees away from the facing direction of F. Accordingly, A and Eare regarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from F whichallow none of F's utterances with a normal voice volume to be deliveredto the A or E as messages. Thus, the display images of A and E aredarkened in the F's view.

C and F who face each other can see no other normal display images ofavatars. Accordingly, C's utterances and F's utterances with a normalvoice volume are not delivered to the avatars other than C and F, asmessages. This allows C and F to discuss a topic different from onebeing discussed by all the avatars on the table without interrupting thediscussion on the table.

FIG. 15-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to thatof FIG. 14-1. Ch faces the same direction as in the situation shown inFIG. 14-1, and speaks with a normal voice volume. A to E look at Ch.Among the avatars, C speaks with a normal voice volume while looking atCh. F looks at C.

FIG. 15-2 shows Ch's view. C speaks to Ch with a normal voice volume,and A to E look at Ch. Accordingly, A to E are regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with anormal voice volume to be delivered to A to E as messages, and thus thedisplay images of A to E are normal in the Ch's view. Since F looks atC, none of Ch's utterances with a normal voice volume is delivered to Fas messages. Accordingly, the display image of F is darkened in the Ch'sview. In this event, as in Example 1, dialogs between C and F can besequentially reproduced. C and Ch can be allowed to choose whether ornot to reproduce these dialogs.

FIG. 15-3 shows C's view. Since C looks at Ch, Ch is regarded as sittingat a distance and in a direction from C which allow C's utterances witha normal voice volume to be delivered to Ch as messages. Accordingly,the display image of Ch is normal in the C's view. Ch's utterance with anormal voice volume is delivered to C as a message. On the other hand, Alooks at Ch and the direction from C to A is some degrees away from thefacing direction of C. Accordingly, A is regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from C which allow none of C's utteranceswith a normal voice volume to be delivered to A as messages. Thus, thedisplay image of A is darkened in the C's view.

FIG. 15-4 shows F's view. Since F looks at C, F is regarded as sittingat a distance and in a direction from C which allow F's utterances witha normal voice volume to be delivered to C as messages. Thus, thedisplay image of C is normal in the F's view. Even though C speaks whilelooking at Ch, the distance between F and C is small enough and F looksat C. Accordingly, C is regarded as sitting at a distance and in adirection from F which allow C's utterances with a normal voice volume,if they were, to be delivered to F as messages.

C's utterance with a normal voice volume is delivered to F as a message.On the other hand, A and E look at Ch and the directions from F to A andF to E are some degrees away from the facing direction of F.Accordingly, A and E are regarded as sitting at a distance and in adirection from F which allow none of F's utterances with a normal voicevolume to be delivered to the each of A and E as messages. Thus, thedisplay images of A and E are darkened in the F's view.

FIG. 16-1 is a perspective view showing a situation subsequent to thatof FIG. 15-1. Ch, who has received C's utterance as a message, faces thesame direction as in the situation shown in FIG. 15-1, and speaks on themessage delivered from C with a normal voice volume. A to F look at Ch.

FIG. 16-2 shows Ch's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume, and Ato F look at Ch. Accordingly, A to F are regarded as sitting at adistance and in a direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with anormal voice volume to be delivered to the each of A to F as messages,so that the display images of A to F are normal in the Ch's view. Ch'sutterances with a normal voice volume are delivered to C as messages. Inthis event, as mentioned previously in Example 1, the dialog between Cand F can be delivered to A to F as messages and be sequentiallyreproduced. A to F and Ch can be allowed to stop reproducing thesemessages.

FIG. 16-3 shows C's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume while Clooks at Ch. Accordingly, C is regarded as sitting at a distance and ina direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with a normal voicevolume to be delivered to C as messages, so that Ch's messages aredelivered to C. A looks at Ch and the direction from C to A is somedegrees away from the facing direction of C. Accordingly, A is regardedas sitting at a distance and in a direction from C which allow none ofC's utterances with a normal voice volume to be delivered to A asmessages. Thus, the display image of A is darkened in the C's view.

FIG. 16-4 shows F's view. Ch speaks with a normal voice volume while Flooks at Ch. Accordingly, F is regarded as sitting at a distance and ina direction from Ch which allow Ch's utterances with a normal voicevolume to be delivered to F as messages, so that Ch's messages aredelivered to F. A and B look at Ch and the directions from F to A and toB are some degrees away from the facing direction of F. Accordingly, Aand B are regarded as sitting at a distance and in a direction from Fwhich allow none of F's utterances with a normal voice volume to bedelivered to the each of A and B as messages. Thus, the display imagesof A and B are darkened in the F's view.

As mentioned previously in Example 1, whether or not to deliver anutterance as a message is determined according to the interest levels ofspeaker's avatar and listener's avatar, each of which is automaticallydetermined on the basis of each direction from one to the other and adistance between the avatars. By contrast, as mentioned previously inExample 2, a voice volume of an utterance is set as utterance strengthin addition to such interest levels. Thus, if a value obtained from theutterance strength and the interest levels exceeds a predeterminedthreshold value, the corresponding utterance is delivered to thelistener's avatar as a message. Accordingly, whether or not to deliveran utterance as a message can be determined by a method similar to thatin real-world conversation. This allows a user of an avatar representinghimself/herself to automatically select to which avatar to deliver anutterance as a message, only by causing the user's avatar to behave in avirtual space as if it were in the real world, more specifically, toappropriately move and to speak with an appropriate voice volume.

FIG. 17 shows an example of a hardware configuration of an informationprocessor 100 as a typical example of a hardware configuration of thedialog server 10, the speaker-user terminal 21 and the listener-userterminal 22 described in the FIG. 1. The information processor 100includes a central processing unit (CPU) 1010, a bus line 1005, acommunication I/F 1040, a main memory 1050, a basic input output system(BIOS) 1060, a parallel port 1080, an USB port 1090, graphics controller1020, a VRAM 1024, an audio processor 1030, an I/O controller 1070, andinput means including a keyboard and a mouse adapter and the like 1100.To the I/O controller 1070, the storage means including a flexible disk(FD) drive 1072, a hard disk 1074, an optical disk drive 1076 and asemiconductor memory 1078 can be connected. An amplification circuit1032 and a speaker 1034 are connected to the audio processor 1030. Adisplay 1022 is connected to the graphics controller 1020.

The BIOS 1060 stores a boot program that the CPU 1010 executes at thetime of the boot-lip of the information processor 100, a programdependent on the hardware of the information processor 100. The FD drive1072 reads a program or data from the flexible disk 1071, to provide itto the main memory 1050 or the hard disk 1074 through the I/O controller1070.

As the optical disk drive 1076, for example, a DVD-ROM drive, a CD-ROMdrive, a DVD-RAM drive and a CD-RAM drive can be employed. Note that anoptical disk 1077 supported in the employed drive needs to be used. Theoptical disk drive 1076 can read a program or data from the optical disk1077 to provide it to the main memory 1050 or the hard disk 1074 throughthe I/O controller 1070.

Each computer program to be provided to the information processor 100 isprovided by a user in the form of being stored in a recording medium,such as the flexible disk 1071, the optical disk 1077 or a memory card.The provided computer program is read out from the recording mediumthrough the I/O controller 1070, or is downloaded through thecommunication I/F 1040, and thereby is installed in and executed by theinformation processor 100. The operations that the computer programcauses the information processor 100 to perform are the same as those inthe aforementioned devices, and accordingly the description thereof willbe omitted.

The above computer programs can be stored in an external recordingmedium. The recording medium used here can be the flexible disk 1071,the optical disk 1077 or a memory card, or can alternatively be amagneto-optical recording medium such as an MD or a tape medium.Furthermore, the recording medium used here can be a storage device,such as a hard disk or an optical disk library, which is provided in aserver system connected to a dedicated communication network or theInternet. In this case, the computer program can be provided to theinformation processor 100 through a communication network.

The above description has been given mainly of the hardwareconfiguration example of the information processor 100. However, it ispossible to implement the functionality similar to that of theaforementioned information processor by installing, onto a computer, aprogram providing the functionality described as that of the informationprocessor, and thus causing the computer to operate as the informationprocessor. Accordingly, the information processor described as anembodiment of the present invention can alternatively be implemented bya method or a computer program thereof.

Each device of the present invention can be implemented as hardware,software, or a combination of hardware and software. A typical exampleof such implementation as a combination of hardware and software is acomputer system including a predetermined program. In such a case, bybeing loaded and executed on the computer system, the predeterminedprogram causes the computer system to perform processing according anembodiment of the present invention.

The program is composed of a group of instructions which can be writtenin any language, codes, or notations. Such a group of instructions allowthe system to directly execute specific functions, or to execute thespecific functions after (1) the instructions are converted intodifferent language, codes or notations, and/or (2) the instructions arecopied to a different medium.

The scope of the present invention includes not only such a programitself, but also program products, such as a medium storing the programtherein. The program for executing the functions of the presentinvention can be stored in any computer readable medium, such as aflexible disk, an MO, a CD-ROM, a DVD, a hard disk device, a ROM, anMRAM, and a RAM. Specifically, this program can be stored in thecomputer readable medium by being downloaded to the medium in a computersystem from another computer system connected thereto through acommunication line, or by being copied from a different medium.

The program can either be compressed and, thereafter stored in a singlerecording medium or be divided into pieces and stored in multiplerecording media.

Although the present invention has been described by use of theembodiment, the invention is not limited to these embodiments. Theeffects described in the embodiment of the present invention are merelya list of the most preferable effects provided by the present invention,and the effects of the present invention are not limited to thosedescribed in the embodiment or the examples of the present invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method comprising the steps of: storingpositional information on at least a first avatar and a second avatar;receiving (i) at least one utterance from said first avatar and (ii) atleast one utterance strength representing an importance or attentionlevel of said at least one utterance; calculating at least one interestlevel between said first avatar and said second avatar based on saidpositional information; generating at least one message from said atleast one utterance in accordance with a value calculated from said atleast one interest level and said at least one utterance strength; andtransmitting said at least one message to said second avatar; wherein,in said step of generating said at least one message, said message isgenerated from said at least one utterance only when a value calculatedfrom said at least one interest level and said at least one utterancestrength is not less than a predetermined threshold value.